First of two articles of an anti-thesis against Daniel Skolovys recent strategy articles "strong hand, big pot, weak hand, small pot.
For the following discussion are now ready to order, please read this article .
Ready? So: How many times have you heard the following sentence? "With Pocket Aces win one small pot or lose big"?
If your answer is "never", you wait it only occasionally. It's just a matter of time.
The same players represented like the maxim that you should play in a raised multiway pot all low cards, and for the following reason:
"Players raise and call raises with high cards, thus increasing the chance that you meet with small maps and hits the high cards."
Both statements contain a grain of truth. It is even more than a grain. I would say that as much truth there is that I think it is wrong to label them as "wrong".
But I will now try to explain where the logic error that stuck in what and how it could come to them.
